Where Piety and Politics Converge

State Patronage of a Guru-Shrine in Bengal

Authors

  • Tara Conners Independant Scholar

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26443/jcreor.v5i1.138

Keywords:

Belur Math, Ramakrishna Misson, Bharatiya Janata Party, heritage, West Bengal

Abstract

This article examines and analyses the socio-political implications of the patronage and development of the Bengali guru-shrine of Belur Math, the headquarters of Ramakrishna Mission, by the  central government of India. Founded by Swami Vivekananda – regarded as one of the most renowned Hindu cultural leaders of nineteenth century colonial Bengal – Belur Math is a symbol of cultural heritage for Bengali-Hindus. In 2017, Belur Math was the only temple from West Bengal to be selected for religious-tourism development under the Pilgrimage Rejuvenation and Spiritual Augmentation Drive (PRASAD) scheme, a national project launched by the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) and helmed by Narendra Modi, the prime minister of India. Under the PRASAD scheme, the math underwent a series of infrastructural developments, which also included accompanying political signage. I use these developments with their accompanying political signage as an entry-point for discussing the politicization of particular devotional sites by the BJP (the ruling party of India since 2014), and consider its various socio-political implications at both the regional and national levels. Using an ethnographic approach, the study asks: 1) What are the political implications of state patronage of a religious site with prominent display of political signage? 2) How do the new developments affect the experiences of everyday visitors at the site? 3) How do the lay devotees interpret the foray of political signage within a religious space? The study addresses these questions through field work observations and interviews with various actors, such as lay devotees and visitors to the shrine and state tourism officers. Through a close analysis of the PRASAD scheme’s implementation at the math and the devotees’ responses to it, I suggest that, although normalised as a government initiative to develop the religious site and promote religious-tourism, the project actually emerges as a well-coordinated political strategy: as the BJP attempts to make  in-roads in Bengal’s regional political landscape, this project is meant to appeal to the middle-class Hindu-Bengali lay devotees of the guru-faith organization. Accordingly, this article provides insights into the BJP’s recent trend of capitalizing on Hindu gurus and sacred shrines as a specific and valued Hindu cultural good, and considers the various ways such alliances benefit both the  political party and the religious organization.

 

 

Author Biography

Tara Conners, Independant Scholar

Due to the fear of facing undue reprisal for publishing under her real name, this author has opted to publish under the pseudonym Tara Conners. Tara Conners holds a PhD from a Canadian post-secondary research institution.

References

Bagchi, Amiya Kumar. “Studies on the economy of West Bengal Since Independence.” Economic and Political Weekly (1998): 2973–2978.

Beckerlegge, Gwilym. “Saffron and Seva: The Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh’s Appropriation of Swami Vivekananda.” In Hinduism in Public and Private: Reform, Hindutva, Gender, and Sampraday, edited by Antony Copley, 31–65. New Delhi: Oxford University Press, 2003.

Beckerlegge, Gwilym. “Swami Vivekananda and the Sangh Parivar: Convergent or Divergent Views on Population, Religion and National Identity?” Postcolonial Studies 9, no. 2 (2006): 121–135.

Beckerlegge, Gwilym. “Responding To Conflict: A Test of The Limits of Neo–Vedāntic Social Activism in The Ramakrishna Math and Mission.” International journal of Hindu studies 11, no. 1 (2007): 1–25.

Beckerlegge, Gwilym. “Vivekananda Kendra.” In Brill Encyclopaedia of Hinduism, vol. 5, edited by Knut Jacobsen, 698–703. Leiden: Brill, 2013.

Beckerlegge, Gwilym. “Celebrating Heritage, Promoting Tourism, and Relocating Svāmī Vivekānanda: A Study of the Vivekananda Rock Memorial.” International Journal of Hindu Studies 25, no. 3 (2021): 165–191.

Beckerlegge, Gwilym. “Modern Guru and Old Sampradaya: How A Nath Yogi Anniversary Festival Became a Performance On Hinduism.” In Public Hinduisms, edited by John Zavos et al., 373–91. New Delhi: Sage, 2012.

Chakraborty, Arpita. “Tracing the Rise of Ascetic Masculinity in India.” In Women, Gender and Religious Nationalism, edited by Amrita Basu and Tanika Sarkar, 195–265. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2022.

Chatterjee, Partha. The Nation and Its Fragments: Colonial and Postcolonial Histories. Vol. 4. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1993.

Copeman, Jacob, Koonal Duggal, and Arkotong Longkumer. “Hindu Nationalism, Gurus and Media.” Religions 14, no. 9 (2023): 1089. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel14091089.

Datta, Polly. “The Issue of Discrimination in Indian Federalism in the Post-1977 politics of West Bengal.” Comparative Studies of South Asia, Africa and the Middle East 25, no. 2 (2005): 449–464.

Dubey, Rajeev. “New Hindu Religious Movements in contemporary India: A Review of Literature.” Sociological Bulletin 64, no. 2 (2015): 152–170.

Gillan, Michael. “Bengal’s Past and Present: Hindu Nationalist Contestations of History and Regional Identity.” Contemporary South Asia 12, no. 3 (2003): 381–398.

Hall, Ian. “Narendra Modi and India’s Normative Power.” International Affairs 93, no. 1 (2017): 113–131.

Hatcher, Brian. Bourgeois Hinduism, or Faith of The Modern Vedantists: Rare Discourses from Early Colonial Bengal. Oxford University Press, 2007.

Jaffrelot, Christophe. “The Political Guru: The Guru as Éminence Grise.” In The Guru in South Asia, edited by Jacob Copeman and Aya Ikegame, 80–96. New York: Routledge, 2012.

Jaffrelot, Christophe, and Peter van der Veer, eds. Patterns of Middle-Class Consumption in India and China. SAGE Publications India, 2008.

Lazzaretti, Vera. “New Monuments for the New India: Heritage-Making in a ‘Timeless City.’” International Journal of Heritage Studies 27, no. 11 (2021): 1085–1100.

Lefèvre, Corinne. “Heritage Politics and Policies in Hindu Rashtra.” South Asia Multidisciplinary Academic Journal 24/25 (2020). http://journals.openedition.org/samaj/6728.

McLaughlin, Mark Joseph. “Lord in the Temple, Lord in the Tomb the Hindu Temple and Its Relationship to the Samādhi Shrine Tradition of Jñāneśvar Mahārāj.” PhD diss., University of California, Santa Barbara, 2014. https://escholarship.org/content/qt4650q3zk/qt4650q3zk_noSplash_d8bf151b5df104dd47d52ef50f49a7d8.pdf.

Meskell, Lynn. “Toilets First, Temples Second: Adopting Heritage in Neoliberal India.” International Journal of Heritage Studies 27, no. 2 (2021): 151–169.

Moodie, Deonnie. The Making of a Modern Temple and a Hindu City: Kalighat and Kolkata. Oxford University Press, 2018.

Nanda, Meera. The God Market: How Globalization is Making India More Hindu. NYU Press, 2011.

Nath, Suman, and Subhasish Ray. “Political Campaigning in West Bengal: Violence, Professionalisation, and Communalisation.” South Asian History and Culture 13, no. 3 (2022): 305–320. https://doi.org/10.1080/19472498.2022.2075208.

Pandya, Samta P. “Seva in the Ramakrishna Mission Movement in India: Its Historical Origins and Contemporary Face.” History and Sociology of South Asia 8, no. 1 (2014): 89–113. https://doi.org/10.1177/223080751350663.

Pechilis, Karen, ed. The Graceful Guru: Hindu Female Gurus in India and the United States. Oxford University Press, 2004.

Pedersen, Jùrgen Dige. “India’s Industrial Dilemmas in West Bengal.” Asian Survey 41, no. 4 (2001): 646–668. https://doi.org/10.1525/as.2001.41.4.646.

Raychaudhuri, Tapan. Swami Vivekananda’s Construction of Hinduism. New Delhi: Oxford University Press, 1998.

Rodden, Jonathan, and Steven Wilkinson. “The Shifting Political Economy of Redistribution in the Indian Federation.” Paper presented at the the International Society for New Institutional Economics, Tucson, Arizona, September 30–October 3, 2004. https://dspace.mit.edu/bitstream/handle/1721.1/18135/rodden.wilkinson.isnie2004.pdf?sequence=1.

Sarkar, Sumit. “‘Kaliyuga,’ ‘Chakri,’ and ‘Bhakti’: Ramakrishna and His Times.” Economic and Political Weekly (1992): 1543–1566.

Sen, Amiya P. “Sri Ramakrishna, the Kathamrita and the Calcutta Middle Classes: An Old Problematic Revisited.” Postcolonial Studies 9, no. 2 (2006): 165–177. https://doi.org/10.1080/13688790600657835.

Singh, Rana P. B., Pravin S. Rana, and Sarvesh Kumar, “Hinduism, Heritagization, and Holy Cities in India.” In Great Transition in Indian Humanities, ed. Chanwan Kim and Hansand Kim, 227–270. Sŏul: Tahae, 2021.

Thachil, Tariq. “Embedded Mobilization: Nonstate Service Provision as Electoral Strategy in India.” World Politics 63, no. 3 (2011): 434–469. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23018777.

Thapar, Romila. “Cultural Transaction and Early India: Tradition and Patronage.” Social Scientist 15, no, 2 (Feb 1987): 3–31. https://doi.org/10.2307/3520436.

Tuan, Yi-Fu. Space and Place: The Perspective of Experience. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1977.

Warrier, Maya. “Processes of Secularization in Contemporary India: Guru Faith in the Mata Amritanandamayi Mission.” Modern Asian Studies 37, no. 1 (2003): 213–253. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3876556.

Williams, P. “Making the ‘Smart Heritage City’: Banal Hinduism, Beautification and Belonging in ‘New India.’” In Spaces of Religion in Urban South Asia edited by Keul, István, 160–175. New York: Routledge, 2021.

Downloads

Published

2024-05-31

How to Cite

Conners, Tara. 2024. “Where Piety and Politics Converge: State Patronage of a Guru-Shrine in Bengal”. Journal of the Council for Research on Religion 5 (1). Montreal, QC, Canada:52–77. https://doi.org/10.26443/jcreor.v5i1.138.